Back to all articlesStrategy

Adobe Commerce vs. Magento Open Source: How We Actually Advise Clients

March 11, 20262 min read

We get asked this question on nearly every discovery call with a merchant who's outgrowing their current platform, and the honest answer is more nuanced than most agencies are willing to give, because it affects how much they bill you. Here's how we actually think about it, having built and maintained stores on both.

What Adobe Commerce actually adds

The license fee buys you B2B functionality out of the box (company accounts, shared catalogs, quote-based ordering), page builder for merchandising without developer involvement, advanced customer segmentation, and — critically for larger catalogs — Adobe-hosted infrastructure options and dedicated support SLAs. For a store doing meaningful B2B volume or running large-scale promotional merchandising, these aren't nice-to-haves; they replace what would otherwise be expensive custom development or a stack of third-party extensions.

What it doesn't change

Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source share the same core codebase. The same security patching cadence applies to both. The same extension ecosystem largely works on both. If your store's pain points are performance, checkout conversion, or catalog management complexity, upgrading to Adobe Commerce alone won't fix any of that — those are architecture and implementation problems, not licensing problems.

Where we tell clients to stay on Open Source

If you're a single-storefront B2C merchant without complex B2B requirements, and your team is comfortable managing merchandising through the admin or a headless CMS layer, the Adobe Commerce license fee is money that could go toward performance work, a better checkout experience, or marketing — all of which move revenue more directly than a licensing upgrade. We've talked several clients out of upgrading when their actual bottleneck was a slow, poorly indexed catalog that Adobe Commerce wouldn't have touched.

Where we recommend the upgrade

  • Genuine B2B requirements: negotiated pricing, company accounts, approval workflows
  • Marketing teams that need to merchandise without filing developer tickets for every campaign
  • Stores at a scale where Adobe's support SLA and infrastructure options materially reduce operational risk
  • Multi-brand or multi-storefront operations that benefit from shared catalog and B2B tooling across storefronts

The question we actually ask first

Before recommending either platform tier, we look at what's actually constraining growth today. Most of the time it's performance, conversion friction, or a maintenance backlog — none of which a licensing change fixes. We'd rather tell a client to spend their budget on the thing that actually moves revenue than sell an upgrade that doesn't address their real bottleneck.

Want a second opinion on your own store?

Get a free, no-obligation Adobe Commerce Health Check from our team.

Claim Free Health Check